Showing posts with label vaccine failure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccine failure. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

FDA licenses high-dose flu vaccine for elderly

I just finished having a conversation with an investigative reporter regarding over-drugging of the elderly in care homes.  This followed on Diane Sawyer's news piece last evening on ABC News.

Then I happened to check a message from Dr. Tenpenny about a vaccine targetted to the elderly containing foru times the amount of the reguar flu vaccine dose.  The premise is alleged to be because the elderly have a less active immune system.

Someday I hope that these people who beleive that if you have a vaccine for every ailment you will health the world will wake up to the fact that the germ theory was completely debunked and we need to have a new paradigm.
By Robert Roos, News Editor


Dec 28, 2009 (CIDRAP News) – The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a high-dose seasonal influenza vaccine for elderly people, whose aging immune systems may not respond effectively to flu vaccines intended for younger people.

The vaccine, Fluzone High-Dose, made by Sanofi Pasteur, contains four times as much antigen (active ingredient) as standard seasonal flu vaccines. The FDA and the company announced its approval Dec 23.

The vaccine is intended for people aged 65 years and older and will be available in time for the 2010-11 flu season, Sanofi officials said in a press release. It apparently is the first flu vaccine licensed in the United States specifically for older people.

In a large phase 3 trial conducted during the 2006-07 flu season, the vaccine induced significantly stronger immune responses than standard-dose vaccine did. Nonserious side effects were more common with the high-dose vaccine, but the overall safety profile was similar to that of the standard vaccine, the company said. The study did not assess actual protection from flu.

The FDA used its "accelerated approval pathway" to review the vaccine, the company having filed its application in March, according to Michelle Yeboah, an FDA spokeswoman. As part of that process, Sanofi will be required to conduct further studies to determine whether the vaccine decreases flu in recipients, the agency said.

"As people grow older, their immune systems typically become weaker," said Karen Midthun, MD, acting director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, in the FDA announcement. "This is the first vaccine that uses a higher dose to induce a stronger immune response that is intended to better protect the elderly against seasonal influenza."

Researchers estimate that elderly people account for about 90% of the deaths related to seasonal flu each year. In contrast, younger and middle-aged adults bear most of the burden of severe cases and deaths related to the pandemic H1N1 virus.
Each dose of Fluzone High-Dose will contain 180 micrograms (mcg) of antigen—60 mcg for each of the three flu strains normally targeted in seasonal vaccines, the FDA said. Standard seasonal flu vaccines contain 15 mcg for each strain, for a total of 45 mcg.

Sanofi Pasteur has been the largest producer of flu vaccine for the US market in recent years. Ellyn Schindler, a company spokeswoman, declined to say today how many doses of the high-dose vaccine might be made for the next season, commenting that production plans are proprietary and will depend in part on customer reservations.

"We have two influenza vaccine production facilities licensed in the U.S. which should provide adequate capacity to produce this vaccine as well as our other formulations of influenza vaccines for the 2010-2011 season," Schindler said.

Sanofi made 50.5 million seasonal vaccine doses this year and is producing 75.3 million doses of pandemic H1N1 vaccine, she noted.

The phase 3 trial of Fluzone High-Dose involved 3,856 elderly people, about two thirds of whom received that vaccine and a third the standard dose of Fluzone, according to Sanofi. A report of the trial was published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) in July.

Volunteers who received the high-dose vaccine had significantly stronger immune responses than those who received the standard dose. The response to the two influenza A strains (H3N2 and H1N1) in the vaccine met predefined superiority criteria, while the response to the B strain met noninferiority criteria, according to the JID report.

Injection-site reactions were more common in those who received the high-dose vaccine, but they were mild to moderate, the report said. The FDA said the rates of serious adverse events were comparable for the two vaccines.

In an editorial that accompanied the JID report, vaccine experts Gregory A. Poland of the Mayo Clinic and Mark J. Mulligan of Emory University commented, "Overall, the rate of adverse events in the HD [high-dose] vaccine group was acceptable although somewhat increased, as would be anticipated" for high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV).
Multiple studies now have yielded "uniform evidence of enhanced immunogenicity, acceptable reactogenicity, safety, and some evidence of efficacy for HD TIV influenza vaccines," Poland and Mulligan wrote.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

It's Old News and You Aren't Getting It

This blog and material found on our original domain, www.leaflady.org, will help you find quite a bit of accurate, scientific information about viruses, cold and flu.

We aren't offering sensationalistic rants as seems to be the driving factor on some other sites. We offer facts and we try to provide information that will help you face health concerns in a more informed and educated approach. We also hope to encourage your enquiring mind so you will seek other corroboration.

Another medical colleague has provided some sound analysis on the current state of flu and vaccines. This doesn't surprise us because the track record for this vaccine, Tamiflu, has been abysmal if you have been tracking the data since the product got the FDA stamp to pass go in exchange for money.

Tamiflu really has been a failure for health but perhaps not for money.

However, since you most likely won't see these latest reports, we'll put them here for your edification.

And remember, the best prevention for flu is good health and sound nutritional status. If you get on this tract, you'll be amazed at the difference, and you'll save a bundle of money over the long term of a healthy life.

Commentary by Dr. Henry Niman www.recombinomics.com

H1N1 Tamiflu Resistance Reporting Delays in North America
November 23, 2008

Based on the level of oseltamivir resistance observed in only one influenza subtype, H1N1, and the persisting high levels of resistance to the adamantanes in H3N2 viruses, CDC continues to recommend the use of oseltamivir and zanamivir for the treatment or prevention of influenza in the United States. Use of amantadine or rimantadine is not recommended.

The above comments from the latest influenza weekly report from the CDC comments on the levels of anti-viral resistance “observed”. However, reports from Europe and North America suggest that virtually all influenza A in the United States this season will be resistant to at least one anti-viral. The resistance rate for H3N2 for amantadines remains at or near 100%. Although test results for this season has been very limited, all H3N2 tested thus far has been resistant to amantadines. Similarly, last season the rate of resistance for the H1N1 sub-clade 2C (Hong Kong) was also 100%. Last season there were two H1N1 sub-clades in circulation in the US, and the rate of Tamiflu resistance for clade 2B (Brisbane/59) was around 10%. However, the level rose to 100% in several countries in the southern hemisphere in the 2008 season, and initial reports from Europe and North America (England, 12/13; Scotland, 2/2; Norway, 1/1; Canada, 1/1; United States, 1/1) suggest the level for clade 2B will be at or near 100% this season.

The numbers “observed” in the United States is low, because the reported number tested is low. In the latest report, the United States has reported 62 H1N1 isolates, but none have been tested for both oseltamivir and amantadine resistance. One isolate collected in September, prior to the official start of this flu season was amantadine resistance, strongly suggesting was clade 2C. One of two isolates tested for Tamiflu resistance this season had H274Y, and it is likely that the other will be amantadine resistant (but test results have not been released) and clade 2C.

Since the level of Tamiflu resistance is expected to be near 100%, it is somewhat surprising that more test results have not been released. The UK has issued an initial report on the 12/13 with H274Y in southwestern England, and has noted that two resistant isolates were also identified in Scotland, indicating the Tamiflu resistance is widespread.

Canada announced the resistance in its first influenza A isolate, but that was over a month ago, and Canada has also not released addition data. Thus, even though the Tamiflu resistance levels of clade 2B are expected to be at or near 100%, each country has only released test results on one clade 2B isolate, and both were resistant, consistent with frequencies reported in Europe this season.

Since most clinicians in North America are unaware of the expectation that the vast majority of Brisbane/59 H1N1 will be Tamiflu resistant, prompt release of test results would be useful.

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Macys Printable Coupons