Thursday, July 31, 2008

Veggie Might: Desert Island Gadgets

by Leigh

As a wholly self-taught home cook, I had never given much thought to gadgets, small appliances, or even utensils. Most of my supplies were hand-me-downs, gifts, or just magically appeared in my kitchen. Oh sure, I would stare at the utensil wall at Bed, Bath and Beyond but mostly to wonder what the heck most of that stuff was for and who really needs an egg separator? Doesn’t the shell do the job pretty well?

Of course, then I didn’t cook. My first five years in New York, I made my living as a waitron and was fed well by others. When I did cook at home, my culinary adventures never strayed far from ramen noodles, box mac and cheese, and grits. All I needed was a saucepan and a spoon, which my mother had supplied me when I went off to college.

Then I switched day jobs. Suddenly, I had to either cook for myself or spend my meager earnings on take-out, which, on my receptionist’s hourly wage, meant the former. I got good at creating easy, cheap, healthy meals with the tools I had. Enter a decent paring knife.

Until my pal C (thanks!) got me started watching cooking shows, I didn’t know what I was missing. My thrifty sensibility remains intact, but the gadgets are harder to resist. Some folks have a weakness for shoes or comic books; mine has become kitchen gear.

Oh, I try to play it cool. Alton, I scoff, do I really have to have silicone baking sheet liners? RR, I most definitely do not need a $15 Garbage Bowl™, thank you very much. Even I have a line; and this from a woman who bought a Martha Stewart cookie shooter on impulse.

Close-out stores are a great way to keep the gadget budget in check. Whenever I’m in the market for a new toy, I mean tool, my neighborhood Jack’s World (upstairs from Jack’s 99¢ stores) is the first place I check. Jack’s World is similar to Odd Jobs, Big Lots, and the like. I’ve gotten most of my indispensable implements there. (The cookie press was only $5! How could I resist?)

Factory-reconditioned small appliances can save big bucks when upgrading your kitchen or starting from scratch. You have to do your homework, but a little diligence will pay off. Sites like Amazon and Overstock can have great deals on brand names, and you never know what you’ll find.

I never aspired to KitchenAid appliances. They always seemed the stuff of TV chefs and people with that one-two punch of bridal registries and wealthy relatives. But when my $30 blender flamed out after 6 months of heavy hummus duty, I needed to go one better. On Amazon, I found a reconditioned KitchenAid blender for $50, more than half off the original price, and just $20 more the discount-store brand. Not only does it do an amazing job, it’s so, so pretty.

Now when I find myself leaving a trail of drool through Bed, Bath and Beyond, pooling at the utensil wall, I pull myself together, make a list, and try to contain myself until I can get to budget safety. (Sometimes I will appease myself with a little trinket, like silicone basting brushes or another inexpensive, absolute necessity. C, I really needed those ice cube trays.)

But when it comes down to it, I survived with very little for many years, and could do it again. Here are my desert island kitchen gadgets/tools that I cannot live without. These are the implements I’d save from fire, flood, and locusts. And I paid full price for none of them.

10” cast iron skillet—A cast iron skillet is an indispensable piece of cookware. It stews; it fries; it bakes; it does it all. And you don’t need to spend the college fund on Le Creuset to get a good one. As long as you care for it properly, a cast iron skillet will get better with age and last forever. Close-out store ≈$8

Silicone spatula—When you want something out of a bowl, food processor, blender, pitcher, pan, pot—especially glass—this thing will grab on and get it out. All of it. There’ll be no hummus left in that blender, no batter left in that bowl, no sauce in that pan. I had no idea how much magic this little do-hickey would do. Plus, silicone is heat resistant, so you can use it with your sensitive cookware when it’s piping hot. My cast iron skillet loves its silicone spatula. Close-out store ≈$2

Mini food processor—Because I have a tiny kitchen (my counter-top is about 1’ x 3’), nothing can sit out. The mini food processor is easily stored and is great for mincing garlic and onions, emulsifying, chopping herbs, and the like. It’s a great time-saver and perfect for a small space. Close-out store ≈$12; Factory-refurbished ≈$30

Blender—Shiny. I love my blender. Factory-refurbished ≈$30

Utility knife—For my birthday, my good friend, A, got me a brand-spanking-new knife, and my world has changed for the better. It has a pretty pink handle, it actually cuts (instead of crushes, like most of my crappy old knives do), and it makes me feel like a real chef. Now I understand what all the fuss is about.

What can you not live without in the kitchen? Any tips for finding them on the cheap?

~~~

If you dig this article, you might also like:
(Photos courtesy of Flickr member The Daily Planet and noshtopia.)

Clorox really isn't going green

The Sierra Club just lost a lot more points with me because of the pay offs they are taking from Clorox in their 'partnering' for a percentage of sales from Clorox's new so-called "green" products. Moeny is the issue of course.

As a person who directs a 501c3 organization I know how important it is to get donations, however the mega-corps always have a reason why the little organizations like CHI (the sponsor of Natural Health News) fails to meet criteria for grants and other donations.

These Clorox products still leave out a lot of definition of ingredients such as çolorant' and 'preservative'. Adding alkalinity builders is a must when you read the highly acid pH of things they use such as alkyl glycoside, lauramide oxide, sodium lauryl sulfate (a known carcinogen), fragrance, ethanol, soda ash (similar to lye), and some others.

Some of the ingredients are found to be manufactured with benzene (carcinogenic) and from synthetic base products as well as petroleum.

For my money, and not in support of the $10 B earned from corporate cleaning products annually, I use simple items. When I have to purchase something I support only those really green companies that have been in the busisness for years, like Bio-Kleen, Dr. Bronner's, Country Save, and others.

I am hoping you will do the same and skip the Clorox effort to be ( sort of) green!
The Green Works™ Ingredient List

Green Works Natural All-Purpose Cleaner (99.93 percent natural): Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agent (alkyl polyglucoside), corn-based ethanol, glycerine, essential lemon oil, biodegradable preservative, colorant

Green Works Natural Dilutable Cleaner (99.20 percent natural): Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agents (alkyl polyglucoside, lauramine oxide, sodium lauryl sulfate), corn-based ethanol, natural alkalinity builders for enhanced performance (potassium citrate, potassium carbonate), fragrance with essential lemon oil, colorant

Green Works Natural Toilet Bowl Cleaner (99.99 percent natural): Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agent (alkyl polyglucoside), citric acid, lactic acid, essential lemon oil, natural thickener (xanthan gum), colorant

Green Works Natural Glass & Surface Cleaner (99.84 percent natural): Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agent (alkyl polyglucoside), soda ash, corn-based ethanol, glycerine, and fragrance with essential lemon oil

Green Works Natural Bathroom Cleaner (99.00 percent natural): Filtered water, coconut-based cleaning agent (alkyl polyglucoside), glycolic acid (hydroxyacetic acid), and essential lemon oil

CHG Favorites of the Week

Food Blog of the Week
Hungry Girl
Extremely bright, mind-bogglingly cheery, and packed to the fargin’ gills with good eating information, Hungry Girl is a young dieter’s dream site: realistic without being too lenient and healthy without being too restrictive. The drink recipes alone are precious, precious resources, but be sure to look around for lots of solid tips.

Food Blog of the Week #2
Elastic Waist
For the weight conscious who might not dig the somewhat Rachael Ray-esque tone of HG, Elastic Waist is a solid alternative. More of a blog than a whole website, its operating theory is that happiness is “healthy living, the occasional bacon binge, and accepting the size of your ass.” Dude. Word. It’s been added to the blogroll here, so if you can’t go right now, give it a shot later.

Food Comedy of the Week
"C.C. Sabathia, Prince Fielder Keep Imagining Each Other As Giant Talking Hot Dog, Hamburger" at The Onion
This made me giggle like a giggly little girl with the giggles. Sabathia’s on my fantasy baseball team, and had the worst April and May in the recorded history of sports. He’s turned it around the last few months (knock on wood), but I reserve the right to make fun. (Thanks to Serious Eats for the link.)

Food Organization of the Week
Charity Wines
It’s an age-old question: how can one drink profusely, support her favorite shortstop, and donate to a major philanthropical organization all at once? The answer, my friends, is Charity Wines. Though I advise STRONGLY against purchasing the Chipper Jones Chardonnay (it will poison your soul and alter your DNA, much like Larry himself), 70% of the proceeds from fine varietals like Santana Select and CaberReyes go to directly to MLB-associated charities. If I may be so bold, I'd call it a home run.

Food Quote of the Week
Building off yesterday’s Simpsons article, this suggestion came from reader Sarah.

(Lisa announces she is becoming a vegetarian)
Homer: Are you saying you're never going to eat any animal again? What about bacon?
Lisa: No.
Homer: Ham?
Lisa: No.
Homer: Pork chops?
Lisa: Dad, those all come from the same animal.
Homer: Heh heh heh. Ooh, yeah, right, Lisa. A wonderful, magical animal.


Food Video of the Week
“I Need Some Fine Wine and You, You Need to be Nicer” by The Cardigans
Nifty, fairly recent pop-rock tuneage from the same Swedish maestros who bestowed "Lovefool" upon us so many years ago. I wondered where they’d been.



Extra Special Totally Unrelated Bonus of the Week
Puppy Dreams from Cute Overload/Jezebel
OMG. OMG. OMG. I want one. Can I have one? Right now? Please mom?



(Photo courtesy of The Onion.)

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Cutting Calories and Saving D'oh: 25 Lessons "The Simpsons" Taught Me About Cheap, Healthy Eating

The Simpsons TV show turns the big Two-Oh next year, making them older than Miley Cyrus, post-Soviet Russia, and everything I own, save a dearly beloved 5th grade softball jersey. Like all good Americans, I adore the show, and always have. I owned a Bartman tee in 1990, can quote “Treehouse of Horror IV” word for word, and even as an adult, model myself after eight-year-old Lisa, who is everything that’s right about our society.

What amazes me most about The Simpsons (beyond the college classes and bible studies) is the effect it’s had on my vernacular. Each day, I’m guaranteed to quote a four-fingered Springfieldian at least once – usually unconsciously, usually “D’oh!” (“Excellent,” and “You don’t win friends with salad” creep in there, too.) And when a show’s been around for so long that it actually CHANGES THE WAY YOU SPEAK, you’re bound to pick up a lesson or two along the way.

So today, sweet readers, CHG is taking a temporary pop culture detour. With the assistance of the characters themselves (or at least their dialogue), here are the 25 rules of cheap, healthy eating I’ve gleaned from 19 years of watching Homer & Co.

1) There is such a thing as being too frugal.

Marge: Lisa, I made you some homemade Pepsi for the dance; it's a little thick but the price is right.
~~~

2) Keeping a budget and paying with cash are two of the easiest, most effective ways to regulate expenditures. Without them, you might not be aware of how much you’re spending.

Moe: Say, Barn, uh, remember when I said I'd have to send away to NASA to calculate your bar tab?
Barney: Oh ho, oh yeah, you had a good laugh, Moe.
Moe: The results came back today. You owe me seventy billion dollars.
Barney: Huh?
Moe: No, wait, wait, wait, that's for the Voyager spacecraft. Your tab is fourteen billion dollars.

~~~

3) Mass-market food companies are there to make money, not to make you healthy.

[Marge has decided to go into the pretzel business.]
Marge: What's my territory?
Frank Ormand: Your territory? Well, let me put it this way: wherever a young mother is ignorant as to what to feed her baby, you'll be there. Wherever nacho penetration is less than total, you'll be there! Wherever a Bavarian is not quite full, you'll be there!
Marge: Don't forget fat people! They can't stop eating!
Homer:
(passing by) Hey! Pretzels!
~~~

4) Those same corporations spend billions marketing junk foods towards American consumers, and despite our best intentions, we’ve become both accustomed and prone to their suggestions.

Homer: Hey, it's the first day of the month. New billboard day. [Drives by, reads first billboard] "This year, give her English muffins." Whatever you say, Mr. Billboard.
~~~

5) It helps to stay current on news about food, nutrition, cost, and cooking, but don’t believe everything you read.

Marge: I don't have e-mail. (crowd gasps)
Homer: Oh Marge, you got to get on the Net. It's got all the best conspiracy theories! Did you know that Hezbollah owns Little Dolly Snack Cakes?

~~~

6) Diet and exercise are the only consistently proven, non-surgical paths to weight loss. Everything else is bunk.

Marge: Homer, has the weight loss tape reduced your appetite?
Homer: Ah, lamentably no. My gastronomic rapacity knows no satiety.

~~~

7) Portion sizes have increased tremendously in America over the last few decades, and are a giant factor in U.S. weight gain. This is especially true for restaurant food and takeout.

Homer: Is this the biggest steak you got? 72 oz.? I thought this was supposed to be a steakhouse, not a little girly, underpantsy, pink doily, tea party place!
Waiter: Well, we do have one steak available upon special request. We call it Sir Loin-A-Lot. It's the size of a boogieboard.
Homer: Ooh, I'll have that one! And to drink ... meatballs.

~~~

8) Eating at home as much as possible is a simple way to regulate nutritional intake and save money.

Apu: Poor Mr. Homer! Could it be that my snack treats are responsible for his wretched health?
[A customer enters.]
Customer: Gimme some jerky.
Apu: Would you like some vodka with that?

~~~

9) Planning menus and shopping ahead of time will prevent last-minute supermarket sprees and oft-pricey impulse purchases.

Marge: Homer, I have to go out to pick up something for dinner.
Homer: Steak?
Marge: Hmm, money's too tight for steak.
Homer: Steak?
Marge: Eh, sure. Steak.

~~~

10) When grocery shopping, it helps to look for whole foods and stick to the perimeter of the store. It’s healthier and less expensive overall.

Homer: Olive oil? Asparagus? If your mother wasn't so fancy, we could just shop at the gas station like normal people.
~~~

11) Instead of purchasing pre-made sauces, mixes, and dressings, create your own at home. The end product will be way tastier, and it’s often cheaper and better for you, as well.

Homer: Got any of that beer that has candy floating in it? You know, Skittlebrau?
Apu: Such a beer does not exist, sir. I think you must have dreamed it.
Homer: Oh. Well, then just give me a six-pack and a couple of bags of Skittles.

~~~

12) Cutting down on meat will make a significant difference in your food budget and calorie intake.

Apu: Let's see ... Farmer Billy's smoke-fed bacon, Farmer Billy's bacon-fed bacon, Farmer Billy's travel bacon ... Mr. Simpson, if you really want to kill yourself, I also sell handguns!
~~~

13) The surest way to diet/budget defeat is to make absolute changes without allowing for the good stuff. Don’t forget to indulge every once in awhile.

Lisa: (to Homer) Is it really worth risking your lives for some sugar?
Marge:
(from kitchen) Dessert's on! I steamed some limes!
Lisa: Godspeed.

~~~

14) Read labels and be wary of health claims. A lot of times they’re just plain bogus. Whole, untouched foods will always be the best way to eat.

Homer: Wanna bite of my doughnut?
Lisa: No, thanks. Do you have any fruit?
Homer: This has purple stuff inside. Purple is a fruit.

~~~

15) While you’re at it, don’t forget to check expiration dates. Especially on bargain-priced foods. Sometimes it’s been marked down because it’s about to go bad.

Homer: Apu, I'm returning a yogurt I wasn't completely satisfied with.
Apu:
[opens the bag] OH MY GOD! If a dead fish and a homeless person had a baby, and the baby puked, and the dog ate the puke, this smells like the rear end of that dog! I'll give you any yogurt in the store just take that thing with you when you go!
~~~

16) Know that fat isn’t always a bad thing. There are good ones – usually naturally-occurring – like those found in avocados, peanuts and eggs.

[Homer has just snatched and stomped on Lenny’s egg sandwich.]
Homer: I saved your life! That egg sandwich could have killed you -- by cholesterol.
Lenny: Sheesh -- forget it, Homer. While it has been established that eggs contain cholesterol, it yet has not been proven they conclusively actually raise the level of serum cholesterol in the human bloodstream.
Homer: So, one of those Egg Council creeps got to you too, huh?

~~~

17) Just because a food is fat-free doesn’t mean it’s low in calories or better for you. Sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and other sweeteners can be just as deleterious to your health.

Dr. Hibbert: Sugar is not only fattening but it's also terribly, terribly addictive. … Uh, is my carton of Pixie Sticks in?
Apu: No, it hasn't come in yet.
Dr. Hibbert: Dammit. When they come in you call me at this number.
[hands over a card]
Apu: 911?
~~~

18) Condiments, toppings, and add-ons are a quick way to pile on fat and calories.

Homer: I'm on a bit of a health kick, so I'll take the low-fat vanilla. With the following toppings: Snickles, Gooey Bears, Charlottesville Chew, Nice 'n Many, Kat Kit, Herschel Smooches, Mrs. Badbar, and Milk Dudes.
~~~

19) Parental habits are key (if not THE key) in how kids learn to eat. Children mirror what they see at home, so it’s important for moms and dads to model healthy behaviors.

Homer: Don't fill up on those vegetables, kids. Save room for nachos!
Lisa & Bart: All right!
Marge:
[disapprovingly] Mmm…
~~~

20) Make eating an experience rather than a chore. Use all your senses to enjoy it fully. The overall slow-down means you’ll consume less.

Homer: I smell cake! Cake that says (sniff sniff) "Farewell" and (sniff sniff) "Best Wishes"!
Nelson: Your old man has an awesome nose.
Bart: Oh, that's nothing. He can hear pudding.

~~~

21) Buy recycled grocery bags. They’re frugal, better for the earth, and you never know when they’ll come in handy for something else.

Belle: Are you wearing a grocery bag?
Homer: I have misplaced my pants.
~~~

22) Speaking of a frugal item with several applications: buy white vinegar. It’s more than a foodstuff. It’s an EVERYTHING.

Mr. Burns: I need to have my eyes re-balled and my brain flushed out with vinegar.
Smithers: Oh and your legs will be back from the shop tomorrow.
Mr. Burns: Excellent.

~~~

23) Read reviews. For all things, everywhere. Restaurants, cookware, recipes – you name it. You might not unilaterally agree with a commenter, but an unbiased opinion (or several hundred unbiased opinions) will keep you from wasting valuable resources and time.

[Homer has become a restaurant critic.]
Sea Captain: I had enough of Homer! His bad reviews are sinking our businesses!
Akira: Then why did you put yours on the window?
Sea Captain: Yarrrr. It covers up the ‘D’ from the health inspector.
~~~

24) Food is almost always tied to emotions. Exploring how and why you eat is vital to understanding issues you may have with it.

Comic Book Guy: Oh, loneliness and cheeseburgers are a dangerous mix.
~~~

25) Remember, true dietary or financial change is possible only through repeated action. It takes a lot of tries to change a behavior fully, so don’t panic if you foul up. Of course, you have to commit in the first place.

Homer: [after watching Barney's movie] Wow, I'll never drink another beer again.
Vendor: Beer here.
Homer: I'll take ten.
~~~

And that’s it. Readers, do you have a favorite Simpsons quote that taught you something valuable? Post away!
~~~

If you dig this article, you might also enjoy…

Cell Phones and Larry King

I viewed Larry King's show on cell phones yesterday and was appalled at the lack of research information spouted by his guests.

I applaud Devra Davis for her previous stand on how poorly we treat cancer and her comments on Larry King last evening during his show, again addressing the cell phone issue.

I don't applaud Larry King because his selection of guests provided little factual information on the known risks, and even embarrassed them selves, especially Ted Schwartz MD, with their ignorance of the science, research and understanding of the issues.

I do have to give one kudo to Sanjay Gupta on the graphic he used to show the penetration of the radio frequency into a child's brain. Little else he said was of value.

I have been researching the research on cell phones and EMF for more than a decade. I know that digital phones are considered as or more dangerous as the old analog style. The danger is from the constant pulsing of EMF from the phone unless you remove the battery.

I know much more but that you can find by searching the articles on the issue on this blog or reading more here.

And Larry, have Dr. Henry Lai on your program next time, maybe he can educate Ted and Sanjay.

Prenatal cell phone exposure tied to behavior
By Anne Harding
Tue Jul 29, 2008

Children whose mothers used cell phones frequently during pregnancy and who are themselves cell phone users are more likely to have behavior problems, new research shows.

The finding "certainly shouldn't be over interpreted, but nevertheless points in a direction where further research is needed," Dr. Leeka Kheifets of the UCLA School of Public Health, who helped conduct the study, told Reuters Health. "It's a wonderful technology and people are certainly going to be using it more and more," she added. "We need to be looking into what are the potential health effects and what are ways to reduce risks should there be any."

Kheifets and her team looked at a group of 13,159 children whose mothers had been recruited to participate in the Danish National Birth Cohort study early in their pregnancies. When the children reached age 7, mothers were asked to complete a questionnaire about their children's behavior and health, as well as the mother's own cell phone use in pregnancy and the child's use of cell phones.

After the researchers adjusted for factors that could influence the results, such as a mother's psychiatric problems and socioeconomic factors, children with both prenatal and postnatal cell phone exposure were 80 percent more likely to have abnormal or borderline scores on tests evaluating emotional problems, conduct problems, hyperactivity, or problems with peers.

Risks were higher for children exposed prenatally only, compared with those exposed only postnatally, but were lower than for children exposed at both time points.

Kheifets and her colleagues note that a fetus's exposure to radiofrequency fields by a mother's cell phone use is likely very small. However, they add, research has shown that children using cell phones are exposed to more radiofrequency energy than adults, because their ears and brains are smaller.

Because cell phone use was so infrequent among children in the study - 30 percent of kids were using a cell phone, but just 1 percent used a cell phone for more than an hour a week - radiofrequency exposure seems unlikely to have caused any behavior problems, they say.

"Another possible explanation for the observed association might be the lack of attention given to a child by mothers who are frequent users of cell phones," the researchers suggest. They note that mothers who used cell phones frequently were of lower socio-occupational status, more likely to have mental health and psychiatric problems, and more likely to have smoked while they were pregnant.

No matter what the factors behind the association are - if there indeed is a real relationship between cell phone use and behavior problems--one simple way to reduce exposure to cell phones would be to use hands-free technology, Kheifets said in an interview.

Editorialists writing in the journal raise the question of whether the publication of these findings may scare people for no reason.

Kheifets and her team believe that while their findings are preliminary, they should be reported. "We felt that the public is quite capable of dealing with proper information," the researcher said. "One shouldn't really try to be paternalistic about it."

SOURCE: Epidemiology, July 2008.
Copyright © 2008 Reuters Limited.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Tuesday Megalinks

All Financial Matters: How Cheaply Can You Brown Bag Your Lunch?
One Wall Street Journal columnist is paying almost $5 for his bagged lunches ($0.38 for a slice of tomato?), but still posts a 50% savings over a $10 sandwich from the local deli. (Thanks to The Simple Dollar for the link.)

Being Frugal: My Square Foot Garden Overfloweth
Summer’s here, and Lynnae finally reaped what she sowed back in late Spring. It’s a lot. It’s giving me serious garden envy.

Best Week Ever: The Top 10 Most Tasteless Cakes
Nice roundup of the worst of the Cake Wrecks blog, with #4 being particularly hideous. Why … would … anyone … eat … GAH.

Consumerist: Get Ready for More Supermarket Price Hikes
According to the Chicago Sun-Times (home of Ebert), “grocery prices are expected to rise 5 percent to 6 percent this year.” Yikes riding bikes. I wonder if costs will keep climbing at that rate. They’re already outpacing salary earnings.

Get Rich Slowly: Hidden Price Increases at the Grocery Store
JD weighs in on ever-shrinking packages of processed foods.

Jezebel: Cultural Understanding Goes Down Better With French Fries, Chicken Nuggets
Yay! Fantastic clip from Tony Bourdain’s No Reservations trip to Saudi Arabia (yes, I call him Tony), in which native Danya Alhamrani guides him through the country’s most prominent fast food selections. The city of Jeddah isn’t exactly representative of the rest of SA, but what an interesting cultural view nonetheless. A must-see.

Jezebel: Telling A Friend She's Fat: Do You Even Go There?
Last I checked, this post had 511 comments. Join in on the fun/rage.

The Kitchn: Tip – Drying Fruits and Vegetables in the Car
This is the most fantastically frugal thing in recorded history. Has anyone out there ever tried it? I would give it a shot, but it might not work as well in the subway.

Money Saving Mom: Lower your grocery bill without clipping coupons
So, you don’t want to blow your Sundays whittling away at newspaper inserts. I understand. So does Crystal. Here, she lists eight effective ways to save cash while avoiding coupons. Plus, billions of commenters sound off with their own valuable suggestions. Super-worthwhile reading from folks in the grocery shopping trenches.

New York Times: A Locally Grown Diet With Fuss but No Muss
It’s like a CSA Santa Claus! “For a fee, Mr. Paque, who lives in San Francisco, will build an organic garden in your backyard, weed it weekly and even harvest the bounty, gently placing a box of vegetables on the back porch when he leaves.” I hope I’m on the Nice list.

New York Times: Food Makers Report Profits as Eating in Gains Favor
There’s hope!

Reader’s Digest: Eat Smart When Dining Out: 20 Tips
In spite of the following Retuers article, diners are increasingly looking for easy ways to health-up their restaurant foods. Here, RD has some suggestions. (Thanks to Consumerist for the link.)

Reuters: U.S. food portions - Monuments of decadence?
We’re Americans! We eat giant food! As we used to say in third grade, “Doy.” (Thanks to Eater for the link.)

Serious Eats: Nintendo DS Cooking Guide Will Help You Make Dinner
Somewhere, The Boyfriend just drooled.

Serious Eats: Out-of-Context Eating
All you need is the first line of the first comment: “I once saw someone open a microwave popcorn bag for their child during Mass,” and you will be totally sucked in. (My sweet Catholic Ma might have killed the popcorn person, sixth commandment or no.)

Serious Eats: What to Eat on a First Date
I realize I might have successfully made myself sound like a lush the last few weeks, but I’d like to add something to this post: beware of overdrinking. Once, on what could have been a fun first date, I downed two too many glasses of champagne. Nothing got sloppy, bad, or out of hand EXCEPT MY BRAIN, which was unable to form halfway interesting thoughts for most of the night. Fortunately, the failed date led me to The Boyfriend, so I guess it wasn’t all bad.

Slate: The Pasta Salad Manifesto
Pair this with Casual Kitchen’s How to Create Your Own Original Pasta Salad for the ultimate in side dish tutorials.

(Photos courtesy of Flickr members Biggie*, Khaled A.K, and UHLMAN.)

Gardasil Reactions Grab CNNs Attention

The interconnections of the internet are always amazing to me, and this one today is of course a benefit when you find your BLOG visited by a CNN link.

This connection came because of the several Gardasil related posts found on Natural Health News, which can be located via the BLOG SEARCH.

Consider that since the vast majority of incidents of HPV are self limiting, or may be treated naturally with herbs and homeopathy, or supplements to help boost immunity, why would you want to inject a substance into your child that is known to cause such reactions.

Reading the CNN story, however, made me think how consistent the arrogance of Bi Pharma corporations always seems to be, especially when their products are questioned surrounding adverse effects and health problems that are inflicted on the recipient or user.

I've highlight my favorites -
Should parents worry about HPV vaccine?

7,802 "adverse event" reports to CDC since Gardasil was approved
Reports claim drug caused nausea and paralysis -- even death

Vaccine manufacturer: Reports don't mean illnesses were caused by drug
Two girls allege in court that the vaccine made them sick

(CNN) -- A vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer is coming under fresh scrutiny amid thousands of complaints linking it to a range of health problems.

Gardasil has been the subject of 7,802 "adverse event" reports from the time the Food and Drug Administration approved its use two years ago, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Girls and women have blamed the vaccine for causing ailments from nausea to paralysis -- even death. Fifteen deaths were reported to the FDA, and 10 were confirmed, but the CDC says none of the 10 were linked to the vaccine. The CDC says it continues to study the reports of illness.

Gardasil prevents the spread of human papillomavirus, known as HPV -- a sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer in a relatively small number of girls and women.

The vaccine's manufacturer, Merck & Co. Inc., says it has distributed more than 26 million Gardasil vaccines worldwide, including nearly 16 million in the United States. It estimates that 8 million girls and women have received the vaccine in the United States since June 2006.

Two girls allege in court that the vaccine made them sick.

One -- Jesalee Parsons of Broken Bow, Oklahoma -- got the shot at age 13.

Jesalee's lawyer, Michael McLaren, said she got the shot on February 27, 2007 and soon developed a fever and felt pain. The next day, he said, Jesalee felt pain in her chest and abdomen.

Her mother, Laura Parsons, said Jesalee spent weeks in the hospital and underwent two surgeries after developing pancreatitis. She says the federal government should have studied the drug more before approving its use.

"I just feel let down by the government," Parsons said.

Merck says it could be a coincidence that the girls got sick after receiving the vaccine.

The company said in a statement that an adverse event report "does not mean that a causal relationship between an event and vaccination has been established -- just that the event occurred after vaccination."

Merck said it would continue to evaluate reports of adverse reactions. It said it "updates product labels with new safety information as appropriate."
http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/07/07/cervical.cancer.vaccine

Monday, July 28, 2008

HPV Vaccine Adverse Events Worrisome Says Key Investigator

Now the scientists are starting to wonder. I hope you are as well, and you get the facts before you force this unknown into the bodies of your daughters and sons.
By Allison Gandey, Medscape Medical News

July 26, 2008 — Serious neurologic, thromboembolic, and autoimmune complications have been reported in patients who received human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Although not the norm, experts suggest that the events are grave enough to encourage caution. "The side effects that have been reported are real and they cannot be brushed aside," Diane Harper, MD, from the Dartmouth Medical School, in Hanover, New Hampshire, told Medscape Oncology. Dr. Harper was a principal investigator of clinical HPV vaccine trials for both Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

News reports of adverse events, teen paralysis, and death have fueled public concern. Back-to-school immunization clinics are stocking up on Merck's Gardasil and more than16 million doses have reportedly already been distributed in the United States alone. But many parents are questioning whether their children should be vaccinated. And many women are wondering whether they should be vaccinated too.

According to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as of June 30, 2008, more than 9700 adverse events have been reported since the vaccine was approved 2 years ago. Of these, 94% were classified as nonserious events and 6% as severe.

Serious Adverse Events

Nervous system disorders, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome and headache
Thromboembolic events
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue problems
Lymphatic system disorders
Gastrointestinal problems
General disorders and administration site conditions
Immune system problems, including hypersensitivity reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria

Most Commonly Reported Events

Fainting
Pain at the injection site
Headache
Nausea
Fever

To prevent fainting, which can sometimes cause serious harm and lead to head injuries, Dr. Harper recommends that patients receive vaccines on a full stomach and be seated when the shots are administered. The FDA recommends that patients remain seated for up to 15 minutes after vaccination.

Dr. Harper also suggests that physicians not vaccinate patients with personal or family histories of the more serious conditions outlined in recent adverse-event reports. "Physicians have a responsibility to communicate risks to patients and if patients and families are concerned, it is reasonable to hold off on vaccinating," Dr. Harper said.

It is a sentiment that is echoed by others, such as Abby Lippman, PhD, from McGill University, in Montreal, Quebec, who is chair of the policy committee at the Canadian Women's Health Network. In this month's issue of the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, she expresses concern about public policies that have seemingly rushed to embrace HPV vaccination. "Why the hurry," Dr. Lippman asks. Especially in developed countries where there is no epidemic of infection and mortality rates from cervical cancer have been in decline.

What is Causing Adverse Events?

The cause of recent complications remains a mystery and it is difficult to know whether they are linked to vaccines. "Nobody knows why we are seeing adverse events," Dr. Harper said.

Members of the antivaccine movement point to a number of potential perils, including the presence of aluminum in injections. Like many vaccines, Gardasil contains aluminum salts. Each 0.5-mL dose contains approximately 225 μg of aluminum, 9.56 mg of sodium chloride, 0.78 mg of L-histidine, 50 μcg of polysorbate 80, 35 μg of sodium borate, and water.

"The scientific work to date seems to suggest that aluminum salts in vaccines are safe," Dr. Harper said. But she told Medscape Oncology that she heard that 1 lot of Gardasil might have had an accidentally high yeast concentration, and this might be why there are problems. "No one knows for sure," Dr. Harper said.

The manufacturer was not available to comment about product yeast concentrations, but directed Medscape Oncology to an online statement responding to questions about recent adverse effects. "Merck has analyzed the adverse events reported for Gardasil relating to the recent reports of death and paralysis, and based on the data available to Merck, believes that no safety issue related to the vaccine has been identified. These types of events are events that could also be seen in the general population."

Richard Haupt, MD, executive director of clinical research at Merck's research laboratories added: "We remain confident in the safety profile of Gardasil."

FDA and CDC Issue Joint Statement Reassuring Clinicians and Patients

Responding to public concern, the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a joint statement on Tuesday reassuring clinicians and patients about the safety of Gardasil. A second vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline's Cervarix, is already available in some countries, but is still being assessed by the FDA.

Despite company and regulatory assurances, some clinicians, who are also parents, say they are less confident about the safety of the vaccines. After reviewing the information, Scott Ratner, MD, a cardiologist with a practice in Franklin Square, New York, and his wife, a rheumatologist, opted to have their 17-year-old daughter vaccinated. It is a decision they say they now regret.

Following vaccination, their teenage daughter began showing signs and symptoms of autoimmune disease. "She went from being a healthy, active teen running, playing lacrosse, and participating on swim team to becoming a chronically ill patient," Dr. Ratner said.

"I worry about the kids who may be having problems, are perhaps struggling with immune damage, and are feeling generally achy and unwell, but are probably going unreported and undiagnosed," he said. Dr. Ratner has 2 younger daughters and he says he definitely won't be encouraging either of them to be vaccinated.

Gynecologist Christiane Northrup, MD, told Medscape Oncology that she won't be advocating that her daughters be vaccinated either. Dr. Northrup appeared on a recent episode of the Oprah Winfrey Show, which has an estimated 20 million viewers per week, most of them women. She told viewers that healthcare dollars would be better invested elsewhere.

Questioning the Safety

Dr. Northrup recommended that the money going toward vaccines and related programs be allocated to general health and wellness initiatives and proper nutrition. This harkens back to the age-old debate between Louis Pasteur and Antoine Beauchamp, Dr. Northrup suggests.

For most of his career, Pasteur subscribed to germ theory, while Beauchamp backed the more unpopular theory of biological terrain. The question: Is it the germs themselves that make people sick or a weakened state of immunity that allows germs to take root? "Pasteur was widely supported, but on his death bed conceded that Beauchamp was right," Dr. Northrup said during an interview. She suggests that this is what experts should be concentrating on now.

Instead of focusing on germ theory by pouring efforts into HPV vaccines, she says more resources should be dedicated to fostering the overall health of the host.

Dr. Lippman makes a similar argument and points to the capacity of healthy, immunocompetent women to spontaneously clear up to 90% of HPV infections — infections, she says, almost everyone will one day acquire — within 1 to 2 years.

When Gardasil was approved in the United States in June 2006, it was hailed as an important day for public health and for women's health. Dr. Harper was quoted as saying that the vaccine is the biggest advance since the Pap smear. Dr. Harper told Medscape Oncology that she still thinks this is the case, but enthusiasm must be tempered with caution.

Dr. Harper noted that we shouldn't be calling the new immunizations cervical cancer vaccines. "Even if everyone was vaccinated, we would still have cervical cancer," she said. "I don't want people to be lulled into thinking this will prevent cancer. If Pap screening rates decline, cervical cancer rates will rise," she emphasized.

If Pap Screening Rates Decline, Cervical Cancer Rates Will Rise

The decline in cervical cancer in developed countries has been largely attributed to regular Pap screening — something Dr. Harper believes has done a superb job. Women who haven't received an HPV vaccine, and even those who have, are still encouraged to undergo regular screening.

At the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting, delegates were enthusiastic. One presenter showed a series of cervical cancer photos and told observers that "these types of pictures will soon disappear in clinical oncology."

Unfortunately, that utopian prediction is unlikely. "Cervical cancer is not a vaccine-preventable disease," Dr. Lippman said during an interview. And in her recent editorial, she points out that surrogate end points — not cervical cancer — were used to measure the efficacy in the clinical trials.

"No one would want to wait to see cervical cancer develop in participants," she writes. "But the general failure to mention that the precancerous lesions chosen for study are not only potentially removable, most (those that are CIN 2) would probably have resolved on their own without any intervention, is arguable."

Many Questions Remain

As previously reported by Medscape Oncology, Sharmila Makhija, MD, from the University of Alabama School of Medicine, in Birmingham, pointed to other limitations of HPV vaccines. Dr. Makhija is the principal investigator on Merck's FUTURE III trial, looking at the vaccine's efficacy in women 24 to 45 years old, and is a coinvestigator on GlaxoSmithKline's vaccine trials.

Dr. Makhija noted that the bulk of the work to date has focused on just 2 types of HPV — 16 and 18. She added that, going forward, more virulent cancer-causing strains could emerge, making it difficult to eliminate disease. And other important questions remain:

How long does the vaccine last?
Will it require a booster?
Who should be vaccinated and at what age?

"While vaccine proponents emphasize the many thousands of women who participated in clinical trials of the product, they gloss over how few young girls in the 9 to 13 year age range, targeted specifically for school-based immunizations, were included," Dr. Lippman argues. She said that only the very short-term immunogenicity and safety, and not the efficacy, of Gardasil was studied.

"It is a good vaccine," Dr. Harper said. "We are simply still in the early stages of investigation."

The World Health Organization (WHO) has weighed in on the vaccines and is recommending that they be considered only 1 component of any successful strategy. Immunization will have to be added to the other aspects of cervical cancer control, Andreas Ullrich, MD, medical officer at WHO's department of chronic diseases and health promotion, said in a news release. "There is no question that early detection will continue to be a key element."

Merck is encouraging healthcare providers and consumers to report any adverse events associated with Gardasil to the company and to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System at 1-800-822-7967.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:570-571. Abstract

No Cell Phone for Children

Last Saturday a car pulled up to my driveway during our town's annual yard sale. A young woman got out of the care with a cell phone planted square against her ear and tucked toward her shoulder for support. Her young child was in a car seat beside her. Two others were also in the car.

I mentioned to her that their is clear eveidence of an increase in breast and thyroid cancer from cell phone use. She turned and walked back to the car and sat directly bside the child, continuing her conversation.

Another woman carries a cell phone clipped to her belt, directly pulsing arenal glands, ovaries, and the hip area where red blood cells are manufactured in bone marrow; several young children were in her care. I saw her at a fundraiser for a woman with bone cancer just last week.

This information should be an eye-opener for parents as it was for Richard Branson's mobile company, when he issued a policy several years back, not to sell the phones or service for children 16 and under.

This article bumps it up another two years, to 18.

Maybe it should be 21, or not at all.

They teach us the skeleton takes about 21 years or so to fully develop, and why this might be the target age.

Tha problem for small children, including those is strollers directly under the mom's chatting on her cell phone, is that since the skull is much finer and thinner in structure than as an adult, radiation has no real barrier to passing through into fragile brain tissue.

Many also do not understand that it takes about ten (10) years for tumours to develop in the pepole expsoed to EMF from cell phones. It may be less for children because their high growth process incicates faster metabolism. Couple this with the more than 30 vaccines pumped into their bodies by the time they are 11, who knows what this game of Russian Roulette will yeild.
Cancer warning adds wrinkle to parenting debate
By JOCELYN NOVECK, AP National Writer
Jul 27, 2008

When Amy Morris' twin boys, then 11, went on an academic trip to Washington last year, she agreed to give them cell phones at the program's request. But this summer she was dismayed to learn that girls at her 8-year-old daughter's day camp were using cell phones they'd taken along in their backpacks.

"We were outraged," says the Connecticut mother, who adds that the camp didn't know. "These girls think it's a cute game. But it's inappropriate, and it's unnecessary."

It's a signature parenting dilemma of the wireless age: Should kids have cell phones? And how old is old enough? It pits our understandable desire to keep tabs on our offspring — not to mention make them happy — against the instinctive feeling that it's simply, well, wrong for youngsters to spend their time chatting and texting over the airwaves.

Now, there's further ammunition for Morris and other reluctant parents like her to stand firm: The warning last week by the head of a prominent cancer research institute to his faculty and staff. Limit cell phone use, he said, because of the possible cancer risk — especially when it comes to children, whose brains are still developing.

The warning from Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, was based on early, unpublished data and came despite numerous studies that haven't found a link between increased tumors and cell phone use. But it's struck a nerve among parents who already have other reasons to resist their children's entreaties.

"Now we hear about this possible medical risk," says Marybeth Hicks, an author, columnist and mother of four. "I couldn't possibly know if it's real or not. But I know that it's probably not necessary for most children to have a cell phone."

To her, "it's part of this whole rush to adulthood — Hello Kitty backpacks for third-graders have cell phone pockets in them! Marketers have skillfully created a groundswell of begging among kids — and we all know that begging can work."

Hicks, whose book "Bringing Up Geeks: How to Protect Your Kid's Childhood in a Grow-Up-Too-Fast World," is about just such problems, has her own personal experience with persistent children.

"My 10-year-old daughter thinks she's deprived," says Hicks. "She's been saying she's the only one at school without a phone, and it's actually getting to be true." And her son, she says, was the only kid in his 8th-grade class without a phone. (He just got one, right before freshman year in high school.)

Hicks, who lives in East Lansing, Mich., is aware that some parents feel cell phones are an essential security tool for their kids. But, she says, "I always know where my kids are. A cell phone is a tool to negotiate the world once you have the responsibility to be out in the world on your own."

Morris, of Weston, Conn., has decided that for her own kids, middle school is about the right time. "My boys are starting to walk home alone sometimes," she says. "I want them to have a phone." Being boys, though, they tend to forget the darned things all the time — especially in situations when they actually need them.

So far, Morris has avoided giving one to her younger child, she says, not an easy thing in a society where kids, especially girls, are so sensitive to social pressures. "I think a lot of parents in this country just give in," she says. She's especially concerned about the rampant text messaging among the younger set.

Statistics from the Pew Research Center show just how deeply ingrained in our daily lives cell phones have become: Fully 78 percent of all adults own them, including 86 percent of 18-29 year-olds and 55 percent of Americans 65 and older. Pew doesn't compile statistics on those under 18.

Text messaging, on the other hand, is the province of the young: 74 percent of 18-29 year-olds do it but only 6 percent of the 65-plus crowd.

It's harder to gauge the tween set (usually defined as between 9 and 13) but it's telling that in 2004, 21 percent of those aged 8 to 10 and 36 percent of the 11 to 14 group had phones, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation — a number sure to have ballooned since then.

Should the latest medical news cause huge concern among parents who HAVE given in? "If you've got good reasons for them to have it, I'd go ahead," says Frank Barnes, a professor who chaired a recent report on the subject. However, he added, "they've probably got other things they should be doing."

As for whether it's a health hazard, Barnes, who teaches electrical and computer engineering at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said it's more a question of "How do you deal with the unknown? We just don't have the data."

Ultimately, parents have to make their own rules — but that's difficult when the social pressure is so strong, notes Lisa Bain, executive editor of Parenting magazine. "The age is creeping down," she says. "Girls tend to get them younger. It's become a status symbol — it makes them feel grown up."

Bain can see both sides of the argument. Parents really need to set limits, she says, especially because so many phones these days are also cameras and have Web access. On the other hand, she said, the first time she dropped her middle-school aged daughter off at the mall, "I thought, thank God she has a cell phone."

Of the recent medical warning, Bain says: "So many scary studies come out. This will give some parents second thoughts, and other parents ammunition. But for the vast majority, it's not going to mean a lot."

After all, says Bain, "It's like standing up against a tidal wave."
___

AP Science Writer Malcom Ritter contributed to this report.
Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press.

Barefoot Contessa's Barbecue Sauce: Gettin' Potlucky

Every coupla weeks, I get together with a group of lovely ladies (including Veggie Might’s own Leigh) for a themed potluck dinner. It’s not your everyday, run-of-the-mill potluck, though. For one, there’s usually copious amounts of beer. For another. everybody gets completely freakin’ nuts with their creations. Nearly all of us are enthusiastic cooks, and it’s a rare chance to go crazy for a non-holiday occasion. We’ve had Mediterranean, Tailgate, and Vegetarian Nights so far, and I don’t think there’s been a dud dish in the group. Plus? THERE’S SO. MUCH. FOOD. By the end of each eve, we’re all like that “KILL ME” scene in Aliens, except our chests are bursting with meats and cheeses instead of hideous HR Giger monsters.

A different chick hosts the potluck each month, and Saturday, it went down at Casa el CHG in lovely Brooklyn, New York. Since our 109-year-old apartment building has a small backyard equipped with a medium-sized Thermos barbecue, a Grill Night theme seemed like the logical choice. So, the ladies (and their respective SOs) came over at 4pm, and we got busy applying some fire to some foodstuff. Seven hours later and EIGHTEEN dishes later, we finally stopped eating. It was heavenly.

The menu looked something like this:

A: Mango Gazpacho and Sugar Cookie S’mores
C: Swordfish, Scallop, and Vegetable Skewers with Lemon-Olive Oil Marinade
J: Grilled Honeysuckle Pineapple and Grilled Peaches with Honey Nut Cream Cheese & Honey
Kris: Fresh Lemonade, Cantaloupe with Prosciutto, and Grilled Flatbread with Eggplant, Gorgonzola, & Prosciutto OR Zucchini, Red Onion, Goat Cheese, & Parmesan
Leigh: Potato Salad and Tempeh Skewers with Peanut Dipping Sauce
M: Barbecue Chicken, and Grilled Corn with Parmesan & Butter
R: Tri-Tip Steak with Cherry Tomato Salsa
S: Taco Dip

A’s husband A also made a sweet corn dish called Tomalito (delicious), and our manfriend B brought along some sweet, spicy Betty Crocker Guacamole. The weather was unusually non-humid, and to top it all off, THERE WERE TWO PUPPIES. (Well, one puppy and one truly adorable Snack. [Who is Leigh's dog, not an actual snack.]) Really, the whole shebang was perfect. I’m aglow. (And still stuffed, 37 hours later.)

One of the (many, many) highlights of this round was M’s chicken, slathered in Barefoot Contessa’s Barbecue Sauce. Ina’s recipes inevitably make one or two appearances each potluck, and they’re generally met with oohs, aaahs, and lots of satisfied burping. Her BBQ concoction was no different. Several other bloggers have raved about it before, and - woof - right on the money. There’s this initial sweetness followed by an unexpected heat, and it’s better than any jarred stuff I’ve ever had. What’s more, BC’s recipe makes a staggering 1-1/2 quarts (48 oz) of sauce, which compensates for the initial investment. Without exaggeration, it will last FOR MONTHS.

One caveat, though: to be totally honest, thanks to a few calorie-packed ingredients (including a half-cup of vegetable oil), it’s not exactly a light sauce compared to most supermarket brands. Nor is it a particularly cheap one. One ounce has about 30 more calories than the average KC Masterpiece or Bullseye and, depending on your local grocery prices, will probably cost more, too. BUT. (But but but.) Great googly moogly, I promise the taste will make up for it. And remember - this is universal sauce. It can be applied to much more than chicken.

So, thanks to M, thanks to the potluck ladies, and be on the lookout later this week for another faboo potluck recipe (hopefully J's pineapple, which ... oh my).

Barbecue Sauce
Makes 48 ounces of sauce
Adapted from Ina Garten.

1 1/2 cups chopped yellow onion (1 large onion)
1 tablespoon minced garlic (3 cloves)
1/2 cup vegetable oil
1 cup tomato paste (10 ounces)
1 cup cider vinegar
1 cup honey
1/2 cup Worcestershire sauce
1 cup Dijon mustard
1/2 cup soy sauce
1 cup hoisin sauce
2 tablespoons chili powder
1 tablespoon ground cumin
1/2 tablespoon crushed red pepper flakes

1) In a large saucepan or Dutch oven, heat vegetable oil over low heat. Add onions and garlic. Cook 10 to 15 minutes, stirring occasionally. Onions should be softer and translucent when done, "but not browned."

2) Add all remaining ingredients to pot. Cook/simmer 30 minutes. Serve or keep in fridge.

Approximate Calories, Fat, and Price Per Serving
73 calories, 2.6 g fat, $0.21 per ounce

Calculations
1 1/2 cups chopped yellow onion (1 large onion): 63 calories, 0.1 g fat, $0.71
1 tablespoon minced garlic (3 cloves): 13 calories, 0 g fat, $0.10
1/2 cup vegetable oil: 970 calories, 109.7 g fat, $0.48
1 cup tomato paste (10 ounces): 233 calories, 1.3 g fat, $1.00
1 cup cider vinegar: 50 calories, 0 g fat, $0.21
1 cup honey: 1031 calories, 0 g fat, $1.44
1/2 cup Worcestershire sauce: 227 calories, 0 g fat, $1.20
1 cup Dijon mustard: 240 calories, 0 g fat, $2.13
1/2 cup soy sauce: 68 calories, 0.1 g fat, $0.76
1 cup hoisin sauce: 563 calories, 8.7 g fat,
2 tablespoons chili powder: 49 calories, 2.6 g fat, $0.09
1 tablespoon ground cumin: negligible calories and fat, $0.03
1/2 tablespoon crushed red pepper flakes: negligible calories and fat, $0.30
TOTAL: 3507 calories, 122.5 g fat, $10.33
PER SERVING (TOTAL/48): 73 calories, 2.6 g fat, $0.21

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Effective Cancer Therapy dates back to the 1800s

"Have you ever wondered why cancer treatment has not changed much in over 70 years? Why is chemotherapy still the mainstay of conventional cancer treatment after all these years of disappointing results for the majority of cancer cell types."

It is very pleasing to read a recent report on the history of an effective natural and nutritional cancer treatment.

With the recent death of Randy Pausch at age 47 from pancreatic cancer, it might well be worth more people and more health care professionals becoming educated on this process.

This method saved the life of Dr. William D. Kelley, a dentist who was diagnosed in the 1960s with pancreatic and liver cancer. Dr. Kelley left us in 2005, more than 40 years after mainstream medicine gave him the "go home, there is nothing we can really do for you" response.

Some years ago I was educated in this method and have seen it be very helpful to those who chose this approach.

This is a method that is provided by health care professionals only, including Nicholas Gonzalez, MD, of New York.

The full article can be read here.

FDA faulted over unapproved uses of medications

Eleven months is a long time for the wheels of government to grind along while many people's health may be at risk of harm.

It might be the double standard at FDA, or a drive to more profit at Big Pharma.

It could also be that detail reps are practicing medicine without a license.

Your role in this is to understand that you do have a right to question any provider writing a prescription, and you should exercise that right.
By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer
Sun Jul 27, 2008

When federal regulators catch a drug company peddling prescription medications for an unapproved use, it takes them an average of seven months to issue a warning, according to a draft report by congressional investigators.

It typically takes four more months for the company to fix the problem. During that time, a lot prescriptions can be written.

The report from the Government Accountability Office delves into a gray area of medical practice and federal oversight: the use of medications to treat conditions other than the ones the drugs were approved for, a practice known as "off-label" prescribing.

Although widely accepted, off-label prescribing can amount to an uncontrolled experiment. While some patients benefit, others get drugs that do not do them much good and end up wasting their money. Some people have been harmed by unexpected side effects.

What makes the practice so difficult to get a handle on is a web of seemingly contradictory laws and regulations.

Drug companies are forbidden to promote medications for uses that have not been validated by the Food and Drug Administration on evidence from clinical trials. Doctors, however, can use their own independent judgment in prescribing medicines. Also, under guidance proposed by the FDA this year, drug companies could distribute to doctors scientific articles that suggest new and unapproved uses for medications.

The situation has raised concerns for Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who fears that federal programs such as Medicare and Medicaid are paying billions for medications used for questionable purposes.

The review that Grassley requested found the FDA is ill-equipped to catch even blatant marketing abuses by drug companies. The agency does not have any staff exclusively assigned to monitor whether companies are following the rule against marketing drugs for unapproved uses.

Copyright © 2008 The Associated Press.

Friday, July 25, 2008

Red Rice Yeast Depletes Co Q 10

I have been attacked by "researchers" because of my awareness of the fact that Red Rice Yeast is a statin and carries the same risks as the pharmaceutical products.

As I have reported previously, for a decade or more, the statins have very serious side effects and RRY carries the same risks.

One of the most overlooked side effects with the statin drugs is the depletion of CO Q 10. This article supports that loss in RRY as well.

While the effect may be less intense, the loss of Co Q 10 is a very serious nutritional depletion that may lead to sudden cardiac death and other health problems such as the cancer link.

This - IMHO - says that statins do not protect your heart.

So if you are using RRY to stave off the high priced Rx, do not fail to take CO Q 10 - minimally 100mg daily or more. This product may be order from us, just send a note and we'll be ahpy to provide the information.
Red Yeast Rice Depletes Coenzyme Q10 Levels in Mice - Safety Update
5/2005
Author: Donald Brown, ND

Reference: Yang H-T, Lin S-H, Huang S-Y, et al. Acute administration of red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) depletes tissue coenzyme Q10 levels in ICR mice. Br J Nutr 2005;93:131-5.

Summary: Eighty-eight adult ICR mice (a commonly used experimental breed of mice) were gavaged with a single dose of an average of 0.3 ml of red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus; China Chemical and Pharmaceuticals, Taipei, Taiwan), in a soybean oil emulsion, at concentrations of 1 g/kg body weight (low dose group) or 5 g/kg body weight (high dose group). A third group of mice, that did not receive red yeast rice, acted as the control.

After treatment, researchers observed the mice for 24 hours for mortality and signs of toxicity. The mice were then sacrificed and coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) levels were analyzed in the heart, liver and kidney. Concentration of monacolin K (lovastatin) was analyzed in the liver only.
No deaths or toxicity were noted in either treatment group. Liver CoQ10 concentrations significantly decreased in the low- and high-dose groups 30 minutes after treatment (p < 0.01), was maximally depleted between 30 and 60 minutes (p < 0.05), and returned to baseline after 240 minutes. Heart CoQ10 levels were maximally reduced between 90 and 240 minutes in both groups; however, CoQ10 concentration in the high-dose group were 47% lower than in the low-dose group at 90 minutes (exact values not reported, p < 0.05). Heart CoQ10 levels did not return to normal during the study period in either group. Thirty minutes after treatment the hepatic monacolin K concentrations were 0.61 mg/g liver in the low-dose group compared to 1.62 mg/g liver in the high-dose group. At 30, 60, 90, 240 and 1440 minutes (24 hours), hepatic monacolin K levels were significantly higher in the high-dose group compared to the low-dose group (p < 0.05). Kidney CoQ10 levels did not change during the experiment. Furthermore, no histological or skin damage was detected.

Comments: Although this was an animal study testing high doses of red yeast rice, these results suggest that health care practitioners should advise patients taking red yeast rice products to routinely supplement CoQ10. Due to the presence of monacolins (especially monacolin K), the mechanism of action of red yeast rice has been attributed to the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. However, there has been debate about how aggressively red yeast rice inhibits the enzyme, especially when comparing the rather modest lipid-lowering results in humans compared to prescription statin drugs. These results suggest that the addition of CoQ10 may serve as an insurance policy against lowered production of CoQ10 in the body while taking red yeast rice. Hopefully, human trials will be completed to attempt to quantify the CoQ10-lowering effect of red yeast rice in humans.

Experiments in Meat: DIY Turkey Breakfast Sausage

Jaime’s tremendous Seitan post on Tuesday got me thinking about meat. More specifically, it made me wonder if I could create my own variety of turkey sausage using ingredients I had lying around the kitchen. (What? It’s a logical leap. … Kind of.) I’d tried it before with some success, but really wanted to nail it this time.

After some searching, I stumbled upon these instructions from Free Cooking Recipes. They looked simple enough, and I had all the flavorings stashed on our spice rack/IKEA-CD-tower-we-use-as-a-spice-rack. So, I defrosted eight ounces of ground turkey, gathered my courage, and went to work.

For the first batch, I tried the recipe almost as-written, substituting ground sage and thyme for poultry seasoning and forgetting the ginger by accident. The end result was salty, a little powdery from all the sage, and definitely more of an evening sausage. I might serve it with pasta in a pinch (after halving the salt).

Batch #2 was more successful, but in a different way. Based on the results for Batch #1, I added some fennel seed, eliminated the poultry seasoning entirely, slashed the salt by 25%, and jacked up the liquid smoke to 3 drops. (P.S. When I say “jacked up the liquid smoke to 3 drops,” I actually mean “accidentally poured 3x the asked-for amount into the bowl.” Hey, if it worked for vulcanized rubber...)

Somehow, someway, this created a decent breakfast sausage. Despite being (still) a tad salty, it had a pleasantly smoky flavor with a nice kick of cayenne at the end. The meat held up well in crumble and link form, and The Boyfriend and our roommate C both gave it the thumbs up.

The recipe for Batch #2 is what’s listed below. Compared to two ounces of yer average turkey breakfast sausage, you save 40 calories and 6 grams of fat per serving. Price depends on how much you pay for the ground turkey, but I worked the cost of this out to $0.14/oz. Not too shabby.

Readers, have you ever tried this? Does anyone have their own recipe for turkey sausage? Maybe something more suitable for the evening? Let’s go MAD WITH MEAT POWER together.

P.S. I just discovered the Enhance function in iPhoto, so my pictures are now guaranteed to be 14% less hideous. I'm comin' for ya, Annie Liebowitz!

DIY Turkey Breakfast Sausage

Makes 4 2-oz links, patties, or crumble servings
Adapted from Free Cooking Recipes.

½ pound 93% fat free ground turkey
2-3 drops liquid smoke
½-¾ teaspoons salt
2/3 teaspoons ground sage
1/2 teaspoon sugar
1/4 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
¼ teaspoon dried thyme
1/8 teaspoon cayenne pepper
2 pinches fennel seed
1 teaspoon olive oil (a little more if making patties)

1) To a large bowl, add turkey, liquid smoke, salt, sage, sugar, black pepper, thyme, cayenne, and fennel. Combine gently using your hands. If making patties or links, shape the meat into loose-but-stable form.

2) Heat oil in pan over medium-high heat. Add sausage to pan. Cook until no longer pink. Do not overcook.

Approximate Calories, Fat, and Price Per Serving
95 calories, 4.25 g fat, $0.27

Calculations
½ pound 93% fat free ground turkey: 325 calories, 16.2 g fat, $0.75
2-3 drops liquid smoke: negligible calories and fat, $0.02
½-¾ teaspoons salt: negligible calories and fat, $0.01
2/3 teaspoons ground sage: 4 calories, 0.2 g fat, $0.16
1/2 teaspoon sugar: 8 calories, 0 g fat, $0.01
1/4 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper: negligible calories and fat, $0.01
¼ teaspoon dried thyme: 1 calorie, 0 g fat, $0.03
1/8 teaspoon cayenne pepper: negligible calories and fat, $0.01
2 pinches fennel seed: 1 calorie, 0.1 g fat, $0.04
1 teaspoon olive oil: 39 calories, 4.5 g fat, $0.04
TOTAL: 378 calories, 21 g fat, $1.08
PER SERVING (TOTAL/4): 95 calories, 4.25 g fat, $0.27

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Pushing Pills for Profit at Pfizer

That little blue pill that cased quite a number of deaths and caused blindness in men is now being pushed on women.

Initially, when this drug was approved for erectile dysfunction in men it came with a warning that women should not touch the pill because there was a concern about a negative effect on hormones.

Now, in a very small trial funded by Pfizer, it seems to be OK if you are a woman taking the risky SSRI anti-depressants and you lose your libido.

The warnings are there to tell you that this is an off label use NOT approved by the FDA. And only a few few women are helped.

SSRI drugs have a major impact on thyroid function. Low thyroid function may have been the cause of the "depression" but your doctor might not have considered this, or the evaluation may not have been complete or thorough.

A well known symptom of low thyroid is lack of libido.

There are safe and effective natural products to help with loss of libido. Two are examples of products I have used for decades in my work. These options are effective for men and women, without the risk of the drug: Vital Nature/Enhance Romance and products from our selection of pharmaceutical grade Taoist herbal formulas.

Another consideration is the money spent by the drug industry, growing year by year. Pfizer spent a paltry $13.8 billion in 2007.
TUESDAY, July 22, 2008
— Viagra is used by millions of aging men for erectile dysfunction, but most research suggests it doesn’t do much for women’s sex lives.

However, a new study suggests that the “little blue pill” could benefit some women. The small, Pfizer-funded trial found that it improved orgasm in premenopausal women who had sexual difficulties due to antidepressant use.

About 1 in 10 women in the U.S. take an antidepressant drug, according to a 2004 survey. And those drugs, particularly selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine (Prozac) and sertraline (Zoloft), are known to be sex-drive killers for men and women.

Study suggests drug works in select women
In the study, H. George Nurnberg, MD, of the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in Albuquerque, and colleagues randomly assigned 98 women, with an average age of 36, to take sildenafil (Viagra) or a placebo.

All of the women were taking antidepressants (mostly fluoxetine or sertraline), and they took a Viagra or a placebo pill about one to two hours before they had sex during an eight-week period, according to the report in Journal of the American Medical Association. (Both researchers and the women were blinded as to who received the placebo and who did not.)

Almost three-quarters of the women who received the placebo reported no improvement in their sex lives compared with only 28% of those who took Viagra. On average, the Viagra users were more likely to reach orgasm (and were more satisfied with them) than placebo-takers.

That sounds promising. However, you have to keep in mind that it’s a manufacturer-funded study, a type of trial that is generally not considered as reliable as research that is conducted independently. And, as the report discloses, Dr. Nurnberg and other co-authors have received research funds and acted as paid consultants to Pfizer and other drug companies in the past.

Needs to be confirmed in larger group of women
About 22% of the women dropped out of the trial, so only 39 Viagra users completed the study, notes Marjorie Green, MD, director of the Mount Auburn Menopause and Female Sexual Medicine Center in Cambridge, Mass., and a clinical instructor at Harvard Medical School.

“All of the other studies on sildenafil [in women] have not been positive,” says Dr. Green. And the patient group is so small in this study, “I think it would be hard to use the results without further study.”

In addition, Viagra is not FDA-approved for use in women, so the risks to women are not completely clear. (Pfizer dropped its effort to get FDA-approval for women after disappointing trials in pre- and postmenopausal women with sexual arousal disorder, according to the study.)

In the recent research, Viagra users suffered from more headaches, nasal congestion, flushing, and visual problems than those who took the placebo.

Viagra and similar drugs inhibit an enzyme (phosphodiesterase type 5) found in eye tissue, male genitals, and other parts of the body. Blocking the enzyme causes smooth muscle to relax and increases arterial blood flow to the penis. This is beneficial to men with erectile dysfunction because it allows more blood to fill the vessels and increases their ability to sustain an erection.

Female sexual dysfunction is more complicated, but similar enzyme signaling is thought to take place in female genital tissue. So it’s possible that phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors may help some women.

Select group of women may benefit
Andrew T. Goldstein, MD, cautions that the findings should not be extrapolated to patients outside the range of the trial. However, he said that sexual medicine experts do think Viagra is worth trying in some female patients.

“This would not be a drug to be used for a 55-year-old woman who complains of decreased desire who is not on SSRIs,” says Dr. Goldstein, an obstetrician and gynecologist at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and an associate professor at George Washington University, who specializes in treating women’s sexual dysfunction. “If it’s used for that, you’re not going to get results, and you’re going to have a frustrated patient.”

However, for patients who are having sexual side effects of antidepressants, Dr. Goldstein says, “It’s worth trying.”

According to Dr. Green, many women start taking antidepressants without even being told that they can cause sexual side effects.

An ongoing Internet survey being conducted by the Women’s Sexual Health Foundation (Dr. Green is on the advisory board) suggests that more than half (54%) of women taking antidepressants were never informed of the potential side effect. In all, 75% of those surveyed said they’ve had a decrease in sexual desire since starting the drugs.

Antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction is “a big problem,” says Dr. Goldstein. “Premenopausal women 18 to 50 often will discontinue their antidepressants because of sexual side effects. So they are focusing on a very important group of women with a very important problem.”

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Macys Printable Coupons